In recent years, the commercial relationship between the US and India
has matured significantly. Over the past decade, two-way merchandise
trade has grown from $44 billion to $74 billion.
However, for a
point of comparison, look for a moment at the US-China trading
relationship. It’s on another level, with bilateral merchandise trade
topping $635 billion last year. A decade ago, US-India trade was 10 per
cent the size of US-China trade. We’re closing the gap: US-India trade
is now 11 per cent as large.
Obviously, we should aim much higher.
We’re leaving money on the table, as the saying goes. We are leaving
opportunities for mutually beneficial growth and job creation untapped.
Pushing the envelope
As
the world’s largest and oldest democracies — bound together by shared
values — why have we not been able to accelerate our two-way trade? It
behoves us to "put a strategic lens on the commercial relationship", to
use Secretary of State Rex Tillerson’s phrase. From the business
community’s perspective, this demands that both the US and India steer
away from protectionist measures to truly live up to the values of free
and fair trade.
The US-India relationship has the opportunity of a
century to reset the regional dynamics in the Indo-Pacific. And there
is every reason to be positive about India’s growth story. On the back
of its very strong and far-reaching reform agenda, India is now
witnessing enhancements in global benchmarks — whether it is in the
World Bank’s ease of doing business index, Moody’s rating, the global
innovation index, or the global competitiveness index. In fact, the
Center for Strategic and International Studies, a bipartisan policy
research group that tracks India’s reform agenda, calculates that nine
out of 30 big-bang reforms have been completed in the three years of
Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government.
At a time when foreign
direct investment is lower globally, India recorded the highest inflow
of FDI in 2016 at $60.1 billion. The Government has fast-tracked 200
infrastructure projects worth $140 billion, backed by technology-driven
and e-governance initiatives. Indeed, as the Economic Survey
2017-18 pointed out, India’s projected economic growth is between 7 per
cent and 7.5 per cent for this year and next year, inflation is down, a
bankruptcy code is helping resolve stressed assets issues, and the goods
and services tax (GST) has resulted in widening the indirect tax base.
In
short, India has emerged as a strong geo-economic player. Global
companies today cannot afford to miss the India opportunity. More than
600 US companies invest in India. Indian companies too are a force to
reckon with. There are signs of India transitioning into an
innovation-led economy, with more than 20,000 startups. If the US-India
story is to succeed, protectionism on either side cannot be the friction
that slows this growth.
Abjure protectionism
Modi’s
clarion call in Davos was "India Means Business". Yet, if the recently
announced budget is a case in point, there are worrying signals for the
business community. Certain investor concerns are still left unaddressed
and these headwinds need to be addressed. Instances such as blunt
imposition of price controls, unpredictable tariffs on agriculture or
electronics products, preferential market access for domestic companies,
and a challenging environment that does not consistently protect
intellectual property can deter further foreign investment. Between 2016
and 2017, investment in the life sciences sector declined by almost 59
per cent from previous years. The Government’s decision to continue the
price control policy portends a continued downward trend in this
critical sector despite other positive moves such as boosting healthcare
spending and health insurance coverage.
India has made tremendous
strides in creating greater tax certainty, predictability, and
transparency as the Government integrates GST into the economy. A
significant positive step toward improving the investment climate would
be to further reduce tax uncertainty for multinational companies and
institutional investors, especially in areas such as resolving transfer
pricing disputes, updating the US-India bilateral tax treaty, and
overhauling tax litigation and administrative processes, among others.
Financial maturity needed
India’s
financial markets can compete with the world’s best, but they must
continue to mature and deepen to support the economic growth Modi has
promised and that Indian and foreign investors are now expecting. Bond
market development remains a prime area for reform if companies and
investors are to have deeper resources for capital and the investment
diversification they need to grow.
On the US side, recent
proposals to restrict legal immigration and calls to unilaterally impose
tariffs have the potential to disrupt a mature trading relationship
that the US enjoys with its partners. This disruption must be avoided.
Ambassador
Ken Juster remarked with great optimism that "India can seize the
strategic opportunity — through trade and investment — to become an
alternative hub for US business in the Indo-Pacific." The urgency to do
this now could not be greater. China’s strategic and economic reach will
only continue to rise. To rise to its full potential, India will
require a renewed focus on reforms and a more open trade architecture.
The writer is president of the US-India Business Council and former assistant secretary of state for South and Central Asia