The government has a set up an anti-profiteering body
empowered to penalise businesses that do not pass on GST benefits to
consumers, but its complex procedures could frustrate the common man,
experts say.
Experts feel that the application form seeking action
against suspected traders requires way too much information for a
common man to provide.
For instance, it may not be possible for
consumers to provide the exact pre-GST price or details of the input tax
credit benefits, if he feels that a restaurant has jacked up food
prices in the menu despite GST tax rate cut to 5 percent from 18
percent.
Abhishek Jain, Partner, EY India said that the
anti-profiteering application form requires detailed information such as
sale price (pre-GST and post GST), taxes (pre-GST and post-GST),
benefits of input credits, etc.
"It
also appears that a separate application may need to be filed for each
good and / or services in reference to which anti-profiteering is
alleged," Jain said.
The National Anti-Profiteering Authority
(NAA), set up last month, has sent out a strong message that the
government will not hesitate to crack the whip if businesses were found
not passing on the benefits of rate cuts or tax credit to the final
consumer.
Under the Goods and Service Tax (GST)-related laws, the
government had introduced an anti-profiteering clause to ensure
businesses transfer the benefit of tax credit to consumer by making
products cheaper.
On Wednesday, the government released the
official form for anti-profiteering under GST that can be used by a
consumer to register a complaint. A rigorous three-level evaluation and
scrutiny by tax officials would enable the consumer to get back the
amount or benefit that was not passed on, if the business is found
guilty.
The entity accused of profiteering may also have to shell
out an 18 percent interest from the date of collection of higher amount
till the date of return of such amount.
Tax officials that Moneycontrol spoke to said that the government is yet to provide specific guidelines for such investigations.
"There
is no clear rule/strategy for investigation in place to deal with
anti-profiteering complaints. The final investigation will be done by DG
Safeguards and things will be looked on a case-to-case basis," a
government official said on the condition of anonymity.
"In fact, it is not even clear what kind of cases can be considered profiteering and what should be avoided," the official said.
Revenue
Secretary Hasmukh Adhia has, time and again, said that the NAA will
evaluate will not look at small cases, but look at only those cases that
have mass impact.
Currently, however, there is no specific
guideline or threshold that would determine how big or small a case is,
the official cited above said.
Another tax expert said that the
anti-profiteering body, which will be wound up two years after its
rollout, should have been set up till now as it has already been five
months since GST’s rollout.
It was only in November that Cabinet
approved setting up of National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA). Last
week, the government appointed the Chairman and the four technical
members of NAA.
The framework of the body comprises a standing
committee, screening committees in every state as well as the
Directorate General of Safeguards.
If consumers feel that the
benefit of a rate cut is not being passed on to them, they can approach
the state’s screening committee for relief.
However, in case the
incident of profiteering relates to an item of mass impact with ’All
India’ ramification, the application has to be directly sent to the
standing committee. If the committee is able to conclude that there is
an element of profiteering, then the matter will be referred for
detailed investigation to DG Safeguards, which shall report its findings
to the NAA.
Further, if NAA confirms there is a necessity to apply
anti-profiteering measures, it has the authority to order the accused
business to reduce its prices or return the undue benefit availed by it
along with interest to the recipient of the goods and services.