MUMBAI:
A few senior tax officials and corporates have requested the government to start Advance Authority for Rulings as early as possible to clear doubts on goods and services tax (GST), as this will prevent companies and associations from approaching courts for clarity. Advance Authority for Rulings (AAR)
is a forum companies customarily approach to get clarity on certain tax
issues to determine their future liability. Absence of such an
authority is leading to many companies and associations dragging the GST Council and government to court, say industry trackers.
At the last count, about 10 writ petitions were filed, challenging
some aspect of GST. About half a dozen more writs would be filed in the
next fortnight alone. The trigger may have been some prominent
companies, associations and multinational banks having either moved
court or with plans to do so. ET had, on Sept 29, reported that
Singapore-based DBS Bank had dragged the Indian government and GST
Council to the Delhi High Court after it was asked to pay integrated
goods and services tax (IGST) on banking services provided to its head
office in Singapore.
Some other writ petitions include the one filed by Rajasthan
consultants for modification of compliance requirements, not charging
interest, penalty, retrospective effect to late fee waivers, composition
window and incomplete utility forms under the GST framework.
"The need for GST AAR
to start functioning at the earliest is paramount as several businesses
would like to have clarity on matters of classification, place of
supply and input tax credit, among others," said MS Mani, partner,
Deloitte India. "Delays would lead to businesses taking a tax position
which could be subsequently challenged by the tax authorities, leading
to avoidable litigation. The need for AAR is more during the initial
period of GST when businesses are grappling with the challenges posed by
a new legislation," said Mani.
However, a senior tax official told ET, "The government is sensitive
towards some issues companies are facing, but instead of filing cases in
courts, representations to the government could be a better solution.
No clarification could be issued in situations where companies and
institutions have approached the court, unless it is directed to us by
these courts." He also added that the government will approach the
Supreme Court in cases where the position taken by some companies or
associations goes against the "very fabric of GST".
In fact, Delhi High Court had questioned the government after a writ
petition filed by an individual questioned why the AAR was not yet set
up. In its reply on September 15, the government said that an advance
ruling would be made available on the GST portal by January 15, 2018.
According to people in the know, the government is taking time mainly
due to two reasons.
"Selecting people with the right profile to head the advance ruling body is very crucial. Also, the IT integration part is taking some time." However, Delhi High Court has asked the government to set up an offline AAR facility by October 20.
Alawyer advising a multinational to ET, "Most multinationals want to
avoid litigation, but there are a lot of issues in GST, and there is no
clarity. How can one have a clear tax strategy if they don’t know what
is the government’s position." The government had also told its tax
officers in September to defend GST.
04 Oct 2017, 06:22 AM